Paradigms and Philosophical Foundations of Islamic Religious Education Research: A Literature Review of Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65118/wathoniyah.v2i2.28Keywords:
Islamic Religious Education, Research Paradigm, Positivism, Qualitative Approach, Mixed MethodsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the paradigms and philosophical foundations of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) research and their relationship with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. This research employed a literature review method by examining books, scientific journals, and relevant academic sources. The findings indicate that positivism is closely related to quantitative research, while post-positivism and constructivism provide the philosophical basis for qualitative research. Mixed methods integrate the strengths of both approaches to produce a more comprehensive understanding of research problems. The study concludes that understanding research paradigms is essential for determining appropriate methods and producing valid and relevant PAI research.
References
Aditya, D. R. (2026). Beyond Paradigmatic Tensions: Toward Context-Sensitive Educational Research in Indonesia. Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 26(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.35312/studia.v26i1.802
Adiyono, A., Ni’am, S., & Akhyak, A. (2024). Methodology of Islamic Studies: Islam as Religion (A Perspective Epistemology, Paradigm, and Methodology). Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 24(1), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v24i1.22636
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Azizah, D. D., & Sa'adah, F. (2024). Mengenali Paradigma Konstruktivisme sebagai Pendekatan Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam. An-Nuha: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(1), 12–25.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications.
Dewi, D. R. (2023). Konsep Kepribadian Guru PAI dalam Perspektif Ilmu Sosial Profetik (Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta). Yogyakarta: Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Ermansyah, R., & Mantau, B. A. K. (2021). Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Karakter Peserta Didik. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 202–221.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications.
Haryati, S., & Dewi, D. E. C. (2025). Integrasi Mixed Methods dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 11(4), 10756. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i04.10756
Hidayat, T., & Asyafah, A. (1970). Paradigma Islam Dalam Metodologi Penelitian Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v4i2.2507
Indrawan, D., & Jalilah, S. R. (2021). Metode Kombinasi/Campuran Bentuk Integrasi dalam Penelitian. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 735–739. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.3.2021.1452
Khoirul Haq, D., Sari Dewi, R., & Nurhasanah, A. (2022). Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru dalam Menerapkan Karakter Disiplin. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 8(2), 1674–1887. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v8i2.474
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mustofa, M. (2024). Epistemology of Paradigms for Positivism, Interpretivism, and Action Research in Educational Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Office Administration : Education and Practice, 3(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v3n3.p214-224
Nurhidaya, M., Hermina, D., Huda, N., & Sumiati, S. (2024). Penggunaan Mixed Method pada Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 14(4), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v14i4.25375
Nursyamsi, N. (2014). Pengembangan Kepribadian Guru. Al-Ta lim Journal, 21(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v21i1.70
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rahma, R. (2025). The Constructivist Approach in Islamic Religious Education: A Theoretical Analysis and Pedagogical Implications. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 145-158.
Rahma, R. (t.t.). The Constructivist Approach In Islamic Religious Education: A Theoretical Analysis And Pedagogical Implications.
Şahin, M. D., & Ozturk, G. (2022). Mixed Method Research: Theoretical Foundations, Designs and Its Use in Educational Research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.574002
Saimah, S. (2021). Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Akidah Akhlak di Madrasah Aliyah Nurul Ittihad Kuala Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 2(2), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v2i2.226
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-2). Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sundaro, H. (2022). Positivisme dan Post Positivisme: Refleksi atas Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Perencanaan Kota dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Filsafat Ilmu, 2(1), 21–33.
Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuntitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 2896–2910.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anisa Siti Nurhaliza, Farid Abdul Majid, Maryam Dwi Lestari, Sinta Niasti, Ayu Aprianti, Bayu Bambang Nur Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 